🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, governments are channeling hundreds of billions into what's termed “sovereign AI” – developing their own artificial intelligence models. From Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, states are vying to develop AI that grasps native tongues and local customs.

The Global AI Competition

This trend is part of a broader international contest dominated by tech giants from the United States and China. While firms like OpenAI and a social media giant allocate enormous capital, developing countries are likewise taking sovereign gambles in the AI field.

Yet with such vast investments involved, can developing nations secure notable benefits? As noted by a specialist from an influential research institute, If not you’re a affluent nation or a major company, it’s a substantial challenge to create an LLM from scratch.”

National Security Considerations

A lot of states are unwilling to use foreign AI models. Across India, as an example, Western-developed AI tools have at times fallen short. A particular instance saw an AI assistant deployed to instruct students in a remote village – it communicated in English with a pronounced Western inflection that was nearly-incomprehensible for local users.

Then there’s the defence dimension. For India’s defence ministry, using certain foreign AI tools is seen as inadmissible. Per an developer explained, It's possible it contains some arbitrary data source that might say that, such as, Ladakh is not part of India … Employing that certain model in a military context is a big no-no.”

He further stated, I’ve discussed with experts who are in the military. They wish to use AI, but, setting aside particular tools, they prefer not to rely on US platforms because data might go overseas, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Projects

As a result, a number of countries are backing national initiatives. A particular such effort is being developed in India, in which a firm is striving to create a national LLM with government backing. This effort has allocated about $1.25bn to artificial intelligence advancement.

The founder envisions a system that is less resource-intensive than leading models from American and Asian corporations. He states that the country will have to make up for the funding gap with expertise. “Being in India, we don’t have the option of allocating massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we compete against for example the enormous investments that the US is investing? I think that is the point at which the fundamental knowledge and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Regional Focus

In Singapore, a public project is supporting language models educated in local regional languages. These particular languages – including Malay, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and others – are often inadequately covered in US and Chinese LLMs.

It is my desire that the individuals who are creating these sovereign AI models were aware of the extent to which and just how fast the leading edge is advancing.

An executive involved in the initiative notes that these tools are intended to supplement more extensive AI, instead of substituting them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he comments, frequently find it challenging to handle local dialects and culture – communicating in unnatural the Khmer language, as an example, or proposing meat-containing dishes to Malaysian consumers.

Developing native-tongue LLMs enables national authorities to include local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a powerful tool built in other countries.

He continues, I am cautious with the term sovereign. I think what we’re trying to say is we want to be more adequately included and we want to comprehend the features” of AI platforms.

Multinational Cooperation

For states attempting to establish a position in an growing global market, there’s another possibility: join forces. Analysts connected to a prominent policy school put forward a public AI company shared among a consortium of middle-income countries.

They refer to the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, in reference to the European productive strategy to build a rival to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. This idea would involve the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of various nations’ AI initiatives – such as the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to develop a competitive rival to the American and Asian leaders.

The main proponent of a study setting out the initiative says that the concept has gained the attention of AI leaders of at least several countries so far, as well as multiple sovereign AI firms. While it is now centered on “middle powers”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda among them – have likewise indicated willingness.

He elaborates, “Nowadays, I think it’s simply reality there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of the existing White House. People are asking such as, should we trust any of this tech? What if they opt to